Search  
site menu
MOVIE MARKETING NEWS
Home

Submit News

RSS Feed
Add to My Yahoo!

Subscribe in NewsGator Online

Subscribe with myFeedster
Subscribe with Bloglines

Contact us

Marketing Categories

Awards
DVD
Film Festivals
Film Industry
Film Marketing
Indie Film
International Film
Market Research
Merchandising
Mobile Video
Movie Marketing Library
New Releases
Publicity
Television Marketing
Theatrical
Video on Demand
Web Marketing
Wireless Marketing


Marketing Archives

April 2005
February 2005
January 2005
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004





Newsletter

Sign up for our weekly newsletter and get free movie marketing news, resources and tips delivered straight to your inbox.

MARKETING BOOKS:
The Complete Independent Movie Marketing Handbook
Movie Marketing: Opening the Picture and Giving It Legs
Books : The Entertainment Marketing Revolution: Bringing the Moguls, the Media, and the Magic to the World The Entertainment Marketing Revolution: Bringing the Moguls, the Media, and the Magic to the World
Books : Selling the Sizzle: The Magic and Logic of Entertainment Marketing Selling the Sizzle: The Magic and Logic of Entertainment Marketing
See more products in our MARKETING STORE...
 


Great Film Sites

Defamer
Cinemaminima
Cinecultist
Metaphilm
Greencine Daily
Filmmaker
Persistence of Vision
Brian Fleming's Weblog
Deep Focus
Film Journey
Blogging Sundance
Indie Blog
Chapman Logic
Trailer Park
Drew's Blog-o-Rama
Media Whore
Blog Critics
Tagline
Geek Roar
Milk Plus

Great Marketing Sites

Marketing Vox
Adverblog
Seth Godin
Adland
Marketing Profs
Adville
PR Machine
Media Map
PR Opinions
PR Bop
TTR2
eMedia Wire
Paid Content
Industry Standard
Thinking by Peter Davidson
Brand Autopsy
eROI

Other Cool Sites

Digital Squeeze
Futurismic
The Numbers
New Media Sphere
 


October 13, 2004

Rumored Paramount Indie Division going Head-on With Fox Searchlight?

I would hate to be Ruth Vitale or David Dinerstein these days with all of the talk about an emerging, bulked-up "Indie Paramount Division." At any rate, The Los Angeles Times has an informative article that delves headlong into conjectureville, and along the way, drops us with some interesting marketing points. Specifically, it lets us know why the forlorn Paramount Classics label has floundered:

Paramount Classics has been stymied by an outmoded, low-risk, art-house business model. Set up by Dolgen in 1998 after he came to Paramount from Sony, the company was inspired by Sony Classics, which has consistently turned a profit by buying classy but low-risk foreign films and documentaries. However, Dolgen emphasized the no-risk part of the equation so much that Paramount Classics never had enough money to bid on top films or market them successfully. While other companies made their own movies, Paramount was limited until recently to acquisitions, preventing it from scooping up a sought-after script or building a relationship with a gifted young filmmaker.

We also get an explaination why Fox Searchlight is Miramax's heir apparent from Tom Freston, co-president of Viacom:

"Once you get past the tent-pole movies like "Spider-Man' or 'Shrek,' the indie film companies are the most financially viable part of the business today," he explained. "A specialty company is a place where you can make a profit on pictures at a relatively low risk, market movies more cheaply and build talent relationships that provide access to great material and bring new creative energy to the parent studio."

Later in the article, Freston goes on to draw parallels between the current crop of indie filmmakers and the Garage Bands of the past. But how "garage" are the major studios willing to get?

I'm not so sure. But I do know this: we're probably going to see the film business version of Sub-Pop in the very near future. The only question is wether or not it will be a studio's satellite...

Related Link:
A new indie film division could pump up Paramount

October 13, 2004 08:10 AM :: TrackBack > Printer-friendly version

 

Comments